Good on you gentlemen. . .here is a few excerpts.
John Edwards' decision last week to participate in public campaign financing set off a qualm-storm in the media about his ranking among the Democratic candidates but, for us, it strongly reaffirmed our confidence in him.
It was deemed a sign of financial weakness by completely fallible political junkies and media critics who've anointed a front-runner despite the fact that the race is too close to call in Iowa, and other candidates have gathered more endorsements and raised more money.
To us, Edwards' decision meant we'd chosen the right candidate, one who prefers public money with its limitations to the complications of accepting donations from donors who prove to be fugitives from justice.
Edwards' move to public financing was principled. It was about his refusal to take corporate campaign contributions -- which he calls corporate bribes. He's got that right.
I'd recommend reading the whole thing. Eventually Democrats in this country will get over their wet dream of nominating a female, or a minority, all for what - never reaching a climax - as neither of these two actually have the electability in a general election. But hey, I know some democrats just want a wet dream.
No comments:
Post a Comment